top of page
  • Twitter
solo TCR Black logo.png

In-Depth Coverage Of The Irish And European Markets

Harms of Cannabis Prohibition: Criminal Justice and Legislative Solutions


In recent years, the global approach to drug policy has undergone a profound transformation. The traditional "war on drugs" mentality, which stigmatised and criminalised drug users, is giving way to a more compassionate and evidence-based perspective. This shift is driven by a growing understanding that punitive measures have failed to curb drug use and its associated harms.


Ireland's Struggle with Prohibition

In Ireland, drug policy has long focused on criminalising personal drug possession. However, data from the Central Statistics Office reveal a troubling trend: approximately 70-77% of drug offences consist of personal possession, leading to the criminalization of 12-15 thousand individuals every year. As cannabis is the most widely used drug in Ireland the logical conclusion to these statistics is that cannabis accounts for the majority of these cases. Even though the government has expressed a commitment to a health-led approach in its National Drug Strategy, concrete steps towards change have been minimal. This policy disconnect has resulted in creating additional harms and dangers for cannabis consumers, with compounding unintended consequences. This approach to date, not only in Ireland but across the globe has resulted in failure after failure, with drug use rates increasing, and illustrating that the deterrence effect of criminal sanctions is ineffective.




One of the most insidious consequences of drug prohibition is the enduring stigma it attaches to individuals who use drugs. This stigma extends across society, permeating various aspects of life and creating significant barriers for those affected. A drug-related conviction, even for personal possession, can be a permanent mark on one's record. This stain often proves more detrimental than the initial offence, severely impacting an individual's employment prospects. Many employers hesitate to hire individuals with drug-related convictions, leading to diminished economic opportunities for otherwise law-abiding citizens. The stigma of drug use persists long after any legal penalties are served, relegating individuals to a life marked by limited prospects.



Stigmatisation doesn't stop at the workplace; it also extends into healthcare settings, a setting where individuals should be honest and open about their consumption. Studies have shown that healthcare professionals' attitudes toward people who use drugs are often riddled with stigma and prejudice. This can result in suboptimal care and hinder effective treatment. In healthcare, where openness and honesty about drug use are crucial for proper diagnosis and care, negative attitudes among professionals can lead to compromised medical outcomes. The last thing individuals seeking help for drug-related issues need is judgment and discrimination, yet this is often their experience within a healthcare system tainted by stigma. The social stigma associated with drug use can lead to profound isolation and discrimination. Outside of health and workplace settings, individuals who use drugs may find themselves marginalised and ostracized by their communities, friends, and even family members. This isolation can exacerbate mental health issues and substance use disorders, creating a vicious cycle of despair.



The criminalisation of drug use contributes to a broader societal perception that those convicted of drug offences are inherently unproductive or even dangerous individuals. This perception is often at odds with reality, as many drug offences involve personal possession rather than violent criminal behaviour. However, the legal stigma persists, leading to reduced support for health-led responses and rehabilitation programs. Public opinion, influenced by stereotypes perpetuated by media and policy, can make it challenging to implement evidence-based, compassionate approaches to drug-related issues.



Synthetic Cannabis: A Consequence of Prohibition

The emergence of synthetic cannabis is a stark consequence of the ongoing prohibition of natural cannabis. Under the black market's shadow, drug dealers peddle synthetic alternatives with no accountability for product quality or safety. This clandestine market often targets younger or inexperienced consumers by disguising these synthetic products in various forms, including jellies and vapes. Such tactics raise grave concerns about the welfare of those who consume these products, as they lack quality control and may contain harmful contaminants. The unpredictability and potential dangers of synthetic cannabis underscore the urgent need for a shift in drug policy. Prohibition not only fails to eradicate drug use but also fosters an environment where dangerous substances thrive. To address this issue effectively, we must move towards comprehensive drug reform, incorporating regulation and oversight to ensure product safety. Furthermore, providing easily accessible drug testing facilities can offer a vital harm reduction strategy, allowing consumers to verify the safety of their substances without fear of prosecution. The growing prevalence of synthetic cannabis serves as a stark reminder that the current approach to drug control does more harm than good, highlighting the pressing need for innovative and progressive drug policies.



Global Perspectives on Solutions

Around the world, countries, governments and institutions are recommending and exploring various solutions to the cannabis conundrum. We are slowly seeing a major shift towards embracing the conclusion that the prohibition of cannabis is more dangerous for public health than any solution for reform. We are beginning to see multiple European countries adopt cannabis reform policies not based on justice, but instead based on a true health-led approach and embracing the fact that with reform comes improved public health outcomes.



Malta is another European country at the forefront of progressive cannabis legislation, demonstrating its commitment to responsible cannabis use. The Authority for the Responsible Use of Cannabis (ARUC) has recently granted 'in-principle' licenses to its initial two cannabis associations, marking a significant stride towards embracing adult-use cannabis consumption and cultivation. This development comes two years after Malta's decision to authorise such practices, showcasing a growing interest in ethical and legal cannabis use. To ensure stringent adherence to rules, ARUC will conduct thorough inspections before approving operational cultivation licenses. Although there have been initial concerns regarding entry barriers for associations, Malta's deliberate approach reflects its dedication to meticulous implementation. This approach is anchored in core principles of social justice, human rights, harm reduction, and responsible cannabis consumption. The nation's unwavering commitment to a progressive cannabis strategy positions it as a model for responsible reform that prioritizes community well-being and human rights. Malta's journey towards responsible cannabis legislation holds the promise of setting new standards for the industry's ethical and responsible development.




Germany is spearheading a progressive approach to drug policy, exemplified by Health Minister Karl Lauterbach's unveiling of a groundbreaking draft bill for recreational cannabis use. This move represents a pragmatic response to combat the black market and drug-related criminality while prioritising public health and responsible consumption. Central to this initiative is a strong emphasis on safeguarding children and teenagers. Germany aims to launch a youth information campaign, "Legal, but...," to promote awareness of responsible cannabis use among young individuals. This multifaceted bill introduces pivotal regulations, permitting adults to cultivate up to three cannabis plants for personal use and decriminalizing possession of up to 25 grams. It emphasises harm reduction over punitive measures, implements advertising restrictions, and designates protection zones. Non-commercial cultivation associations will collectively grow and distribute cannabis under stringent legal conditions to ensure responsible usage. Collaborative efforts with the Federal Center for Health Education and cultivation associations aim to raise awareness about potential risks and foster a culture of responsible cannabis consumption. Germany's progressive stance extends to medical cannabis, reinforcing its commitment to patients who rely on cannabis for health reasons. Germany's multifaceted approach to cannabis reform centred on responsible cultivation, consumption, and education, positions it at the forefront of innovative drug policy in Europe.



Cannabis Social Clubs: A Path to Regulation

Given the recent advances across Europe, Cannabis Social Clubs (CSCs) have re-emerged as a pivotal element of progressive drug policy. These clubs, which initially took root in the 1990s, are experiencing renewed relevance as legal frameworks surrounding cannabis evolve. At their core, CSCs function as legal associations composed of adult cannabis consumers who collectively engage in cannabis cultivation for personal use. This collective approach ensures that supply aligns with demand, operates on a not-for-profit basis, prioritises transparency, and centres on public health. Notably, CSCs maintain an open dialogue with authorities and actively seek to engage in community education regarding cannabis use. While the fundamental principles governing CSCs remain consistent across many regions, specific regulations can vary. For instance, in Uruguay, the registration process for CSC entails specific requirements, including a membership range of 15 to 45 individuals, non-profit status, and a designated single location for all cultivation and distribution activities.


One of the primary objectives of CSCs is to provide a safe and regulated environment for cannabis consumers. By pooling resources and cultivating cannabis collectively, CSCs aim to reduce the reliance on the illegal black market, where product quality and safety are often uncertain. This shift toward regulated cannabis supply has been motivated by the desire to ensure that consumers have access to a higher standard of cannabis products, thereby promoting public health and safety.


However, the journey for CSCs has not always been smooth. In Uruguay, for instance, the regulatory framework imposed stringent requirements on these clubs, leading to delays in their establishment. A cumbersome registration process, mandatory individual consumer registration for members, and the necessity for CSCs to maintain a single location for all activities were among the regulatory challenges. These hurdles initially discouraged some consumers, who found it more convenient and cost-effective to turn to the illicit black market.


Despite these early difficulties, CSCs have gradually gained acceptance. The regulated cannabis supply has become increasingly popular, with a rising number of consumers willing to register as cannabis consumers to access a safer product. This shift demonstrates the potential of CSCs to offer a viable alternative to the unregulated black market and highlights the importance of responsible cannabis cultivation and distribution.


In closing, the global shift towards progressive drug policy reflects a growing understanding that prohibitionist approaches do more harm than good. By prioritising public health, harm reduction, and responsible cannabis use, nations are forging a path toward more compassionate and evidence-based drug policies. The lessons learned from countries like Malta and Germany, along with the potential of CSCs, offer hope for a future where drug policies are not punitive but supportive of the well-being of individuals and communities.

52 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page